the view
from this side
of the stone
now rolled away
takes my breath
in awestruck wonder
who would've believed it
a new world received
spacious and free
fruitful and abundant
rich and full
alive
but o how difficult the terrain
and how long the journey
in arriving at this place
who could've imagined
in the midst of the pain
and the struggle
and the cross
that this new land
could be so beautiful
something had to die
in order for
something new
to be born
Featured Post
Book of the Month: Schola Caritatis: Learning the Rhythms of God's Amazing Love
Starting a new feature for the next several months called Book of the Month. I will present one of my books and tell you a little of the ...
Wednesday, February 27, 2013
Friday, February 22, 2013
one
full of myself
may it never be
but only you
my dear jesus
as rain falling into a pond
becomes one
there is no longer any rain
only the pond
as a stream flowing into the sea
becomes one
no longer any stream
only the sea
as light coming into a room
from two windows
becomes one
no longer windows
only light
may i melt into you
so that there is
no more me
but only you
my beloved jesus
(inspired by the writings of Teresa of Avila)
may it never be
but only you
my dear jesus
as rain falling into a pond
becomes one
there is no longer any rain
only the pond
as a stream flowing into the sea
becomes one
no longer any stream
only the sea
as light coming into a room
from two windows
becomes one
no longer windows
only light
may i melt into you
so that there is
no more me
but only you
my beloved jesus
(inspired by the writings of Teresa of Avila)
Sunday, February 17, 2013
ash wednesday and valentine's day
I'm not sure how often it happens, in fact maybe it has happened a few times before and I was just not paying attention (which wouldn't be terribly surprising knowing myself the way I do), but Ash Wednesday and Valentine's Day being back to back this year caught me more than a little off guard. I mean there you are on Wednesday having ashes placed upon your forehead and reading scripture (Joel 2:12-14) that invites you to return to the Lord with all our heart, with fasting and weeping and mourning. And then to rend your heart and not your garments...heaviness, sadness, mourning, sorrow, weeping, contrition, desperation, etc. Then comes Thursday and you are sitting across the table from the one you love and adore in an incredibly romantic restaurant, filled to overflowing with affection as you celebrate the life and the love that you are so privileged to share with each other. A bit of a contrast wouldn't you say? Weeping one day and filled with affection the next. A pretty odd pairing to say the least; or so it would seem. Maybe, however, it's not so odd after all.
In the last couple of weeks I have been captured by a gospel passage that brings these strange bedfellows together. And one, therefore, that has really given me a great picture of what the season ahead (Lent) is really supposed to be. It is the story of the woman in Luke 7:36-50 that comes to Jesus while he is dining in the home of Simon the Pharisee. She is not named, but everyone knows who she is. In fact, she has quite a reputation in town; it would seem her reputation has even become her identity. That is until she meets Jesus. We're are not told exactly when or how that happened, but somewhere along the road these two had met before and it had changed everything about her. And now here she is, on this particular evening, entering a house that she had no business entering. In fact she shouldn't have been there at all; I mean a woman "like her" just didn't barge into the house of a Pharisee, especially when he was entertaining. He had invited Jesus to dine with him, and a bunch of his Pharisee buddies as well I'm sure, so they could all get an up close look at this man that everyone was talking about. Whether it was curiosity or hostility that inspired the invitation we are not sure; although we can probably guess. All we are sure of is that he had invited Jesus to his house, and he and his other guests were reclining at the table.
And it is in the midst of this "dinner party" that she comes; uninvited and uncaring that she is uninvited. She didn't care about protocol. She didn't care about political correctness. She didn't care what anyone thought or said. All she cared about was getting to the feet of her beloved Jesus. She only had eyes for Him. So she enters the room and doesn't look back, making a beeline straight for His feet. And when she gets there she does the most amazing combination of things: she stood behind him at his feet weeping, and began to wet his feet with her tears. Then she wiped them with her hair, kissed them and poured perfume on them (Luke 7:38). Did you catch that? She was weeping and she was kissing; sorrow and affection, Ash Wednesday and Valentine's Day. Two things which seem contrary, but are actually inseparable. It is the gospel brought to life; two things that always must be connected in this life of faith. You see the gospel is so much more than one or the other, it must always be both.
There is always a weeping that is such a necessary part of the picture. It involves a deep recognition of our utter sinfulness, brokenness, helplessness, and desperation. It is what happens within us when we come face to face with the absolute horror of our sin, which crucified Christ. And weeping is much more than simply crying; it is an activity that is deeply redemptive. It involves a deep recognition and a deep healing. These were not normal tears, they came from somewhere deep within; from that place of godly sorrow that Paul talks about in 2 Corinthians 7:10. The godly sorrow that leads to repentance. But as necessary as the weeping is, we can't stop there. There is more.
That's where the kissing comes in. For not only did she weep, but she kissed. As a matter of fact the literal translation of the Greek is that she kissed (his feet) much. She smothered him with kisses. She could not stop. She just went on and on. Just look at verse 45: this woman, from the time I entered, has not stopped kissing my feet. His love for her had completely captured her heart. It had kindled an uncontrollable affection deep within her that simply could not be contained. She could not stop if she wanted to, so smitten with love for Him was she. This is the part that we usually miss during Lent, but it is a part that really cannot (or should not) be separated from the fasting and the mourning and the weeping. We must always be kissing Him as well; and kissing Him much at that. Which begs the questions: Are we completely captured by His love? Does a deep affection for Him well up from the core of our being? Are we showering Him with our kisses? Are we falling more and more deeply in love with Jesus each and every day?
So maybe Ash Wednesday and Valentine's Day are not such an odd couple after all. Maybe they are two beautiful parts of an unspeakably beautiful gospel. And maybe, just maybe, I'll decide to celebrate them together every year.
In the last couple of weeks I have been captured by a gospel passage that brings these strange bedfellows together. And one, therefore, that has really given me a great picture of what the season ahead (Lent) is really supposed to be. It is the story of the woman in Luke 7:36-50 that comes to Jesus while he is dining in the home of Simon the Pharisee. She is not named, but everyone knows who she is. In fact, she has quite a reputation in town; it would seem her reputation has even become her identity. That is until she meets Jesus. We're are not told exactly when or how that happened, but somewhere along the road these two had met before and it had changed everything about her. And now here she is, on this particular evening, entering a house that she had no business entering. In fact she shouldn't have been there at all; I mean a woman "like her" just didn't barge into the house of a Pharisee, especially when he was entertaining. He had invited Jesus to dine with him, and a bunch of his Pharisee buddies as well I'm sure, so they could all get an up close look at this man that everyone was talking about. Whether it was curiosity or hostility that inspired the invitation we are not sure; although we can probably guess. All we are sure of is that he had invited Jesus to his house, and he and his other guests were reclining at the table.
And it is in the midst of this "dinner party" that she comes; uninvited and uncaring that she is uninvited. She didn't care about protocol. She didn't care about political correctness. She didn't care what anyone thought or said. All she cared about was getting to the feet of her beloved Jesus. She only had eyes for Him. So she enters the room and doesn't look back, making a beeline straight for His feet. And when she gets there she does the most amazing combination of things: she stood behind him at his feet weeping, and began to wet his feet with her tears. Then she wiped them with her hair, kissed them and poured perfume on them (Luke 7:38). Did you catch that? She was weeping and she was kissing; sorrow and affection, Ash Wednesday and Valentine's Day. Two things which seem contrary, but are actually inseparable. It is the gospel brought to life; two things that always must be connected in this life of faith. You see the gospel is so much more than one or the other, it must always be both.
There is always a weeping that is such a necessary part of the picture. It involves a deep recognition of our utter sinfulness, brokenness, helplessness, and desperation. It is what happens within us when we come face to face with the absolute horror of our sin, which crucified Christ. And weeping is much more than simply crying; it is an activity that is deeply redemptive. It involves a deep recognition and a deep healing. These were not normal tears, they came from somewhere deep within; from that place of godly sorrow that Paul talks about in 2 Corinthians 7:10. The godly sorrow that leads to repentance. But as necessary as the weeping is, we can't stop there. There is more.
That's where the kissing comes in. For not only did she weep, but she kissed. As a matter of fact the literal translation of the Greek is that she kissed (his feet) much. She smothered him with kisses. She could not stop. She just went on and on. Just look at verse 45: this woman, from the time I entered, has not stopped kissing my feet. His love for her had completely captured her heart. It had kindled an uncontrollable affection deep within her that simply could not be contained. She could not stop if she wanted to, so smitten with love for Him was she. This is the part that we usually miss during Lent, but it is a part that really cannot (or should not) be separated from the fasting and the mourning and the weeping. We must always be kissing Him as well; and kissing Him much at that. Which begs the questions: Are we completely captured by His love? Does a deep affection for Him well up from the core of our being? Are we showering Him with our kisses? Are we falling more and more deeply in love with Jesus each and every day?
So maybe Ash Wednesday and Valentine's Day are not such an odd couple after all. Maybe they are two beautiful parts of an unspeakably beautiful gospel. And maybe, just maybe, I'll decide to celebrate them together every year.
Tuesday, February 12, 2013
lent
Lent is a hard, but incredibly good season—a season that initiates the
most sacred part of the Christian year.
It is the time where we journey with Christ to the cross. It is the time when we see both the enormous
cost of our sin, and the enormous love of our Savior. It is the season where we celebrate the
incredible mystery (often referred to as the paschal mystery) that life always
follows death; resurrection always comes after crucifixion. It is a time where we celebrate the truth
that, for God’s people, suffering and sadness and pain and brokenness—and
death—do not have the final word, but life (God) does. Thus, it is a season where we are invited by
God to “come and die” that we may live.
Lent is a forty-day period
(not including Sundays) that is meant to echo the forty days Jesus spent in the
desert and the forty days Moses spent on the mountain with God. It begins on Ash Wednesday and concludes on
Easter Sunday. Sundays are not included in the forty-day count because every
Sunday is a joyful celebration of our Lord's resurrection—a Little Easter. The word Lent is derived from the Old English
lencten, which means “spring”; that transitional time between late
winter and early summer in which our world begins to wake up from its slumber
and come to life once again.
Ash Wednesday (from the
Latin Dies Cinerum, meaning "Day of Ashes") is the first day
of Lent. On this day, we focus intensely on our utter and complete sinfulness
and the necessity of Christ's suffering and death to purchase our
salvation. Ashes are referred to many
times in the Old Testament as a sign of sorrow, mourning, repentance, and
mortality (2 Samuel 13:19; Esther 4:1-3; Job 42:6; and Jeremiah 6:26). Many
churches use ashes during Ash Wednesday services as part of a rite called the
Imposition of Ashes. According to this custom, ashes (traditionally made by
burning palm fronds used on Palm Sunday of the previous year) are mixed with a
small amount of olive oil and applied to the forehead of each worshipper. The
smudge mark made by the dirty ashes is a powerful reminder that we are all going
to die; because death is the high cost of our sinfulness—sin of thought, word,
and deed. The fact that the ashes are placed on our foreheads in the sign of
the cross focuses us on Jesus, the only way to forgiveness, salvation, and life
eternal.
~Jim Branch
Lent,
2012
Saturday, February 9, 2013
weeping and kissing
One of the Pharisees asked him over for a meal. He went to the Pharisee’s house and sat down at the dinner table. Just then a woman of the village, the town harlot, having learned that Jesus was a guest in the home of the Pharisee, came with a bottle of very expensive perfume and stood at his feet, weeping, raining tears on his feet. Letting down her hair, she dried his feet, kissed them, and anointed them with the perfume. (Luke 7:36-38 The Message)
There are so many gospel stories where I would love to have been a fly on the wall. This is definitely one of them. I would love to have seen this extravagant outpouring of love...weeping and kissing and anointing...in person. I would love to have seen her face, so I could know what kind of tears these really were. Were they tears of regret, remorse, and shame? Were they tears of relief, release, and renewal? Were they tears of recognition, affection, and gratitude? Somehow if I could see her face I think I would know the answer. And maybe the word weep itself is a hint as to the true answer. And also the fact that the word weep is coupled with the word kiss (an odd pairing to say the least); that should be a hint as well.
Richard Rohr says that weeping is a deeply spiritual practice; one that we have overlooked, and ignored the value of, for quite some time. He says: "Weeping is different from beating up on ourselves. Weeping is a gentle release of water that washes, baptizes, and renews. Weeping leads to owning our complicity in the problem. Weeping is the opposite of blaming and also the opposite of denying. It leads to deep healing when inspired by the Spirit."
That would explain why the weeping in this passage is accompanied by an abundance of kisses, which are lavished on the feet of Jesus just like the perfume. Only if there was some sense of deep healing going on in the heart of this woman, would the weeping be the type that would also evoke an abundance of kisses. So there is no doubt, the weeping consists of realizing the incredible depth of her sinfulness, but also, coupled with the kisses, recognizes the deep affection of the Savior--which completely captures her heart with love for Him in return. It should be no less for me. Somehow I long to capture the Spirit of the weeping and the kissing, so that I will know the depth of my sin in a way that captures my heart and my life with the affection of, and for, my Savior.
For in this life of faith weeping and kissing are inseparable because...whoever has been forgiven much loves much.
There are so many gospel stories where I would love to have been a fly on the wall. This is definitely one of them. I would love to have seen this extravagant outpouring of love...weeping and kissing and anointing...in person. I would love to have seen her face, so I could know what kind of tears these really were. Were they tears of regret, remorse, and shame? Were they tears of relief, release, and renewal? Were they tears of recognition, affection, and gratitude? Somehow if I could see her face I think I would know the answer. And maybe the word weep itself is a hint as to the true answer. And also the fact that the word weep is coupled with the word kiss (an odd pairing to say the least); that should be a hint as well.
Richard Rohr says that weeping is a deeply spiritual practice; one that we have overlooked, and ignored the value of, for quite some time. He says: "Weeping is different from beating up on ourselves. Weeping is a gentle release of water that washes, baptizes, and renews. Weeping leads to owning our complicity in the problem. Weeping is the opposite of blaming and also the opposite of denying. It leads to deep healing when inspired by the Spirit."
That would explain why the weeping in this passage is accompanied by an abundance of kisses, which are lavished on the feet of Jesus just like the perfume. Only if there was some sense of deep healing going on in the heart of this woman, would the weeping be the type that would also evoke an abundance of kisses. So there is no doubt, the weeping consists of realizing the incredible depth of her sinfulness, but also, coupled with the kisses, recognizes the deep affection of the Savior--which completely captures her heart with love for Him in return. It should be no less for me. Somehow I long to capture the Spirit of the weeping and the kissing, so that I will know the depth of my sin in a way that captures my heart and my life with the affection of, and for, my Savior.
For in this life of faith weeping and kissing are inseparable because...whoever has been forgiven much loves much.
Monday, January 28, 2013
one thing
But whatever was to my profit I now consider loss for the sake of Christ. What is more, I consider everything a loss compared to the surpassing greatness of knowing Christ Jesus my Lord, for whose sake I have lost all things. I consider them rubbish, that I may gain Christ. Philippians 3:7-8 (NIV)
The very credentials these people are waving around as something special, I’m tearing up and throwing out with the trash—along with everything else I used to take credit for. And why? Because of Christ. Yes, all the things I once thought were so important are gone from my life. Compared to the high privilege of knowing Christ Jesus as my Master, firsthand, everything I once thought I had going for me is insignificant—dog dung. I’ve dumped it all in the trash so that I could embrace Christ and be embraced by him. Philippians 3:7-9 (The Message)
But seek first his kingdom and his righteousness, and all these things will be given to you as well. Matthew 6:33
As Jesus and his disciples were on their way, he came to a village where a woman named Martha opened her home to him. She had a sister called Mary, who sat at the Lord’s feet listening to what he said. But Martha was distracted by all the preparations that had to be made. Luke 10:38-40 NIV
The Master said, “Martha, dear Martha, you’re fussing far too much and getting yourself worked up over nothing. One thing only is essential, and Mary has chosen it—it’s the main course, and won’t be taken from her.” Luke 10:41-42 (The Message)
One thing I ask of the Lord,
this is what I seek:
that I may dwell in the house of the Lord
all the days of my life,
to gaze upon the beauty of the Lord
and to seek him in his temple.
For in the day of trouble
he will keep me safe in his dwelling;
he will hide me in the shelter of his tabernacle
and set me high upon a rock.
~Psalm 27:4-5
One thing. It seems to be a recurring theme in Scripture for me these days. First there is Philippians 3:7-9, where Paul says that all of the things he thought were so important in this life are actually just rubbish compared to the one thing, the high privilege of knowing Christ Jesus. And the word rubbish is definitely a tame version of what he really says. In fact Curly (City Slickers) and Eugene Peterson might be far more accurate. The Greek word he uses here is skubalon, which means refuse or excrement, particularly of animals. In other words, something really detestable. Paul is saying that all things are just refuse, compared to the one thing; knowing Jesus.
Then there is Luke 10, where Martha is worried and upset about many things, and Jesus reminds her that only one thing is needed. In fact, he tells her that her sister Mary has chosen what is better (sitting at His feet and listening to what He had to say) and it will not be taken away from her.
Then of course there's Matthew 6:33, that reminds us, amidst all of the cares and worries of this life, to seek first his kingdom and his righteousness, and all these other things will be given to you as well. Jesus knew that it is far too easy to allow the other things of life to be what consumes our minds and our hearts in a way that leaves no room to seek the one thing.
And finally, there is Psalm 27; my Psalm for the week. And another great reminder of how incredibly easy it is, in this busy and chaotic world, to lose track of the one thing because of the many things. For only one thing really matters; to dwell in the house of the Lord all the days of our lives; to gaze upon His beauty; to seek him in his temple. If the one thing was the occupation, and preoccupation, of our souls, the way it was with Mary, what incredibly different lives we would lead.
Thursday, January 24, 2013
personality or paradigm
On his arrival, Jesus found that Lazarus had already been in the tomb for four days. Bethany was less than two miles from Jerusalem, and many Jews had come to Martha and Mary to comfort them in the loss of their brother. When Martha heard that Jesus was coming, she went out to meet him, but Mary stayed at home.
“Lord,” Martha said to Jesus, “if you had been here, my brother would not have died. But I know that even now God will give you whatever you ask.”
Jesus said to her, “Your brother will rise again.”
Martha answered, “I know he will rise again in the resurrection at the last day.”
Jesus said to her, “I am the resurrection and the life. He who believes in me will live, even though he dies; and whoever lives and believes in me will never die. Do you believe this?”
“Yes, Lord,” she told him, “I believe that you are the Christ, the Son of God, who was to come into the world.”
And after she had said this, she went back and called her sister Mary aside. “The Teacher is here,” she said, “and is asking for you.” When Mary heard this, she got up quickly and went to him. Now Jesus had not yet entered the village, but was still at the place where Martha had met him. When the Jews who had been with Mary in the house, comforting her, noticed how quickly she got up and went out, they followed her, supposing she was going to the tomb to mourn there.
When Mary reached the place where Jesus was and saw him, she fell at his feet and said, “Lord, if you had been here, my brother would not have died.”
When Jesus saw her weeping, and the Jews who had come along with her also weeping, he was deeply moved in spirit and troubled. “Where have you laid him?” he asked.
“Come and see, Lord,” they replied.
Jesus wept.
Then the Jews said, “See how he loved him!”
But some of them said, “Could not he who opened the eyes of the blind man have kept this man from dying?”
Jesus, once more deeply moved, came to the tomb. It was a cave with a stone laid across the entrance. “Take away the stone,” he said.
“But, Lord,” said Martha, the sister of the dead man, “by this time there is a bad odor, for he has been there four days.”
Then Jesus said, “Did I not tell you that if you believed, you would see the glory of God?”
So they took away the stone. Then Jesus looked up and said, “Father, I thank you that you have heard me. I knew that you always hear me, but I said this for the benefit of the people standing here, that they may believe that you sent me.”
When he had said this, Jesus called in a loud voice, “Lazarus, come out!” The dead man came out, his hands and feet wrapped with strips of linen, and a cloth around his face.
Jesus said to them, “Take off the grave clothes and let him go.” (John 11:17-44)
I don't know why, but for some reason I always find myself trying to defend Martha whenever I read one of these familiar passages containing her and her sister Mary's story. Maybe it is because I feel sorry for the criticism she endures from various religious circles. Maybe it is because I believe (or hope) she is simply misunderstood. Probably it is because I am really trying to defend (and feel okay about) my Martha-like tendencies. Whatever the case, something always seems to rise up in me--and really rise up in the midst of the folks I talk to from time to time--whenever the Mary/Martha discussion rears its head. It is understandable; we live in a Martha-like culture that values and applauds performance and productivity, busyness and getting things done. I too, through the years, have fallen into the "well Martha can't really help it, that's just the way she's made...it's her personality" way of thinking. But after reading and reading and rereading these stories...I'm not so sure that's the case.
For example, in this particular instance, if we look closely at the details of this interaction, it actually leaves me with a lot of questions. On the surface, Mary and Martha's reaction to the death of their brother looks very similar, but the closer I look, the more and more different they seem to be. For instance, as they hear of Jesus' arrival near Bethany, Martha immediately goes out to meet him, but Mary stays home. Why is that? And as they each approach him, Martha seems to march right up, while Mary falls at his feet. And then there's the fact that Jesus asks Martha a question: “I am the resurrection and the life. He who believes in me will live, even though he dies; and whoever lives and believes in me will never die. Do you believe this?" But for Mary he has no question...only his tears. Instead of asking her about her belief (as he does Martha), He weeps for her. Why are there no tears when Martha comes? And even when He orders them to take away the stone, Mary is silent (I believe hopefully so) while Martha responds: “But, Lord, by this time there is a bad odor, for he has been there four days.” Is this the comment of one who truly believes that Jesus is indeed the resurrection and the life? Could it be that as Martha spent her time worried and anxious about many things, and distracted by all the preparations that had to be made, and Mary was sitting at his feet listening to what He had to say, that something happened deep in the heart of Mary that convinced her to her core that Jesus was indeed worthy of her trust, regardless of the circumstances of life? Mary had developed both a posture (at His feet...Luke 10:39, John 11:32, John 12:3) and a practice (listening to what He had to say) that seem to allow her to trust Jesus in a way that Martha was not yet capable of.
Am I being too hard on Martha...maybe...probably. But it has nothing to do with not being fully convinced of the fact that Jesus loved her deeply (see John 11:5) . It has more to do with the quality--or lack thereof--of her relationship with Him. I don't know about you, but I just want more than that. There is so much depth and quality that Martha seems to be missing. I want so much more, and I'll bet you do too. In contrast, Mary just seems to get it. I mean, if you had to pick one of them to sit down with and talk deeply about Jesus, which one would you pick? For me it's a no brainer. I want the one who sat at his feet and listened to all he had to say; the one whose heart was totally and completely captured by Him.
So, I think there is something significant in all of this for me: that the difference between Martha and Mary is not simply one of personality, but something much bigger than that. The difference is one of paradigm; the way the two of them see things. It is a difference in the way they see themselves, and the way they see life, and the way they see Jesus. When we begin to see with Mary's eyes; to see what the better part really is, and set our eyes and our hearts on that...on Him, then true transformation takes place. Transformation that allows us to know God's heart so deeply that we are able to trust His heart, even when we can't see His hand.
“Lord,” Martha said to Jesus, “if you had been here, my brother would not have died. But I know that even now God will give you whatever you ask.”
Jesus said to her, “Your brother will rise again.”
Martha answered, “I know he will rise again in the resurrection at the last day.”
Jesus said to her, “I am the resurrection and the life. He who believes in me will live, even though he dies; and whoever lives and believes in me will never die. Do you believe this?”
“Yes, Lord,” she told him, “I believe that you are the Christ, the Son of God, who was to come into the world.”
And after she had said this, she went back and called her sister Mary aside. “The Teacher is here,” she said, “and is asking for you.” When Mary heard this, she got up quickly and went to him. Now Jesus had not yet entered the village, but was still at the place where Martha had met him. When the Jews who had been with Mary in the house, comforting her, noticed how quickly she got up and went out, they followed her, supposing she was going to the tomb to mourn there.
When Mary reached the place where Jesus was and saw him, she fell at his feet and said, “Lord, if you had been here, my brother would not have died.”
When Jesus saw her weeping, and the Jews who had come along with her also weeping, he was deeply moved in spirit and troubled. “Where have you laid him?” he asked.
“Come and see, Lord,” they replied.
Jesus wept.
Then the Jews said, “See how he loved him!”
But some of them said, “Could not he who opened the eyes of the blind man have kept this man from dying?”
Jesus, once more deeply moved, came to the tomb. It was a cave with a stone laid across the entrance. “Take away the stone,” he said.
“But, Lord,” said Martha, the sister of the dead man, “by this time there is a bad odor, for he has been there four days.”
Then Jesus said, “Did I not tell you that if you believed, you would see the glory of God?”
So they took away the stone. Then Jesus looked up and said, “Father, I thank you that you have heard me. I knew that you always hear me, but I said this for the benefit of the people standing here, that they may believe that you sent me.”
When he had said this, Jesus called in a loud voice, “Lazarus, come out!” The dead man came out, his hands and feet wrapped with strips of linen, and a cloth around his face.
Jesus said to them, “Take off the grave clothes and let him go.” (John 11:17-44)
I don't know why, but for some reason I always find myself trying to defend Martha whenever I read one of these familiar passages containing her and her sister Mary's story. Maybe it is because I feel sorry for the criticism she endures from various religious circles. Maybe it is because I believe (or hope) she is simply misunderstood. Probably it is because I am really trying to defend (and feel okay about) my Martha-like tendencies. Whatever the case, something always seems to rise up in me--and really rise up in the midst of the folks I talk to from time to time--whenever the Mary/Martha discussion rears its head. It is understandable; we live in a Martha-like culture that values and applauds performance and productivity, busyness and getting things done. I too, through the years, have fallen into the "well Martha can't really help it, that's just the way she's made...it's her personality" way of thinking. But after reading and reading and rereading these stories...I'm not so sure that's the case.
For example, in this particular instance, if we look closely at the details of this interaction, it actually leaves me with a lot of questions. On the surface, Mary and Martha's reaction to the death of their brother looks very similar, but the closer I look, the more and more different they seem to be. For instance, as they hear of Jesus' arrival near Bethany, Martha immediately goes out to meet him, but Mary stays home. Why is that? And as they each approach him, Martha seems to march right up, while Mary falls at his feet. And then there's the fact that Jesus asks Martha a question: “I am the resurrection and the life. He who believes in me will live, even though he dies; and whoever lives and believes in me will never die. Do you believe this?" But for Mary he has no question...only his tears. Instead of asking her about her belief (as he does Martha), He weeps for her. Why are there no tears when Martha comes? And even when He orders them to take away the stone, Mary is silent (I believe hopefully so) while Martha responds: “But, Lord, by this time there is a bad odor, for he has been there four days.” Is this the comment of one who truly believes that Jesus is indeed the resurrection and the life? Could it be that as Martha spent her time worried and anxious about many things, and distracted by all the preparations that had to be made, and Mary was sitting at his feet listening to what He had to say, that something happened deep in the heart of Mary that convinced her to her core that Jesus was indeed worthy of her trust, regardless of the circumstances of life? Mary had developed both a posture (at His feet...Luke 10:39, John 11:32, John 12:3) and a practice (listening to what He had to say) that seem to allow her to trust Jesus in a way that Martha was not yet capable of.
Am I being too hard on Martha...maybe...probably. But it has nothing to do with not being fully convinced of the fact that Jesus loved her deeply (see John 11:5) . It has more to do with the quality--or lack thereof--of her relationship with Him. I don't know about you, but I just want more than that. There is so much depth and quality that Martha seems to be missing. I want so much more, and I'll bet you do too. In contrast, Mary just seems to get it. I mean, if you had to pick one of them to sit down with and talk deeply about Jesus, which one would you pick? For me it's a no brainer. I want the one who sat at his feet and listened to all he had to say; the one whose heart was totally and completely captured by Him.
So, I think there is something significant in all of this for me: that the difference between Martha and Mary is not simply one of personality, but something much bigger than that. The difference is one of paradigm; the way the two of them see things. It is a difference in the way they see themselves, and the way they see life, and the way they see Jesus. When we begin to see with Mary's eyes; to see what the better part really is, and set our eyes and our hearts on that...on Him, then true transformation takes place. Transformation that allows us to know God's heart so deeply that we are able to trust His heart, even when we can't see His hand.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)